The Packers pretty much had to sign Aaron Rodgers to a long-term deal. After the Summer the organization had with Brett Favre a long drawn out contract negotiation with Rodgers is the last thing Green Bay needed. Statistically Rodgers has been solid thru 7 games and that pretty much forced the Packers hand in to doing something. However the main stat to look at is 4-3. That is Green Bays record at the time of A-Rodg’s extension. Is that good enough for a long term commitment? I personally am a Rodgers fan and think this is a good move, but it is definitely debatable. What do you think of the move?
Insights from the NewsChannel 8 Sports Team
-
Recent Posts
- Corey Hart To Wear Sunglasses At Night?
- The NFL Free Agent Rumor Mill Is Buzzing
- Tebow to Packers/Vikings? Don’t Laugh Yet…
- Mauer Contract Extention Appears Imminent
- NFC Championship Game Wrap
- The Offseason Begins For The Packers
- Concentrating On The Wrong “What-Ifs”
- The Many Faces of Aaron Rodgers
- Woodson Has Meant Everything to Packers
- It’s The Most Wonderful Time Of The Year
- UW-Football Team Shows Off Some New Moves
- Prized Recruit Royce White Leaving Minnesota
- Badgers Now Know How It Feels
- Report: Brewers Sign Wolf
- Brewers Open To Dealing Hart
Categories
© 2010 The Sporting Word | Powered by WordPress
PrimePress theme by Ravi Varma
on Dec 22nd, 2008 at 9:00 am
The Roger’s move is good strategic move for the long term. As a tactic for this season, potentially getting to a superbowl playoff berth, packer senior management scores a grade of “F” with to many changes of players and not accounting for injuriy potentials. Thompson needs to find another career, and not with the packers.